That would be this Peter Saunders, from the Centre for Independent Studies:
It is "immoral ... to take money from people who maintain themselves and families ... and redistribute it to people who have no intention of even trying to achieve self-reliance".2. Questioned about Saunders' views, she praised his academic standing and referred MPs to his book Welfare to Work in Practice.
3. This confused MPs who read the book because it promotes diametrically opposite views:
"There may be advantages in allowing those with the weakest attachment to ... work to 'opt out' and live on an 'unconditional basic income' financed by the rest of society."The author turns out to be a different Professor Peter Saunders.
4. The latest statement from Paula Bennett insists that she has appointed the Saunders she wanted, i.e. the rightwing hack on wingnut welfare,* and it was only her rationale for appointing him that was confused.Journalists are not sure which Paula Bennett issued this statement.
There is nothing I could add that would improve this story so instead here's a Muybridge animation of
* Believes that the working class are poor because they have inherited lower intelligence. Lauded by the Murdoch Press. Dropped out of Australian academia to write a novel about the Islamic Apocalypse featuring a failed Australian academic as the hero. Good enough for advising the NZ government.













