Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Gnireenigne

It follows from Rule 34 that given "porn of it", one should be able to work backwards and reverse-engineer the original, inspirational "it".

The logic is geometric and unassailable... yet in this case the only output from the software is the 'Divide by Zero' warning.

8 comments:

  1. Segment access violation. Heap corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It has belatedly occurred to me that there is a flaw in my logic -- I have assumed that the operation 'IsPornOf(x)' has an inverse operation, i.e. that the Intertubes has the properties of a group.

    But suppose the Interlattice is a ring?

    ReplyDelete