Tuesday, May 24, 2011

The concept:


Not very clear on it.

28 comments:

  1. The bottom left one might produce interesting results.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If the goal is intimidation rather than efficiency, you still might earn some points.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  3. You haven't seen the 5-blade version for a closer shave.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bottom right would be perfect for preparing crudité platters!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Noted fascist and carmaker Henry Ford had a variety of car execution devices, the best known being the flivvertigibbet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The bottom left one might produce interesting results.

    Putting the "man" in mandoline.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You've got a blade, and some kind of gravity-driven mechanism.

    You can kill someone with that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Noted fascist and carmaker Henry Ford had a variety of car execution devices, the best known being the flivvertigibbet.

    I prefer when they were deFordestrated.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Of course, the car designed for monkeys was a failure. Perhaps if they had named it something other than fivvertigibbon.

    ReplyDelete
  10. By pulling repeatedly on the rope and then tying it to the cleat, you have stored energy. By cutting the rope you can use that energy, converting it to motion that can do work...

    Er, sorry.

    Class dismissed...

    ReplyDelete
  11. yes, if the first apparatus had springs at the bottom, the platform would be bounced back to the initiial position and be re-energised. Thus saving the State a few cents with each execution!
    At the end of a year the staff could have a nice lunch somewhere using the savings.

    ReplyDelete
  12. reminds me I should really get back on development of the Wingnut Processor.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Now THATS a late night infomercial I'd stay up for!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Of course, the car designed for monkeys was a failure.

    You do not want them driving anyway after they've been at the monkey bars.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bottom right would be perfect for preparing crudité platters!

    For many years I laboured under the misapprehension that Les Crudités was a stand-up comedian from North England.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The bottom left one would also be great for quickly shaving off a few pounds.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Or making Manwiches.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Apparently Rick Santelli is again auditioning to be the test subject on these devices.

    ReplyDelete
  19. >Get apparatus
    you have apparatus

    >behead royalty
    you can't do that

    >kill royalty
    you can't do that

    >execute royalty
    you can't do that

    >slice appetizers
    you now have shaved queen

    ReplyDelete
  20. shaved queen

    I suspect googling that would return a LOT of hits.

    ReplyDelete
  21. With a stage name "Whore Durve"

    ReplyDelete
  22. I suspect googling that would return a LOT of hits.
    IT WAS A MISTAKE! I was researching the history of the Commonwealth and the shared Queen!
    Don't judge me,man!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Umm, yeah, I'll have the shaved queen with the spotted dick.

    And a nice madeira...

    ReplyDelete
  24. You people can clearly not recognize a pipe organ transplant device. The cutout is for the organist, who must maintain the bellows during the procedure.

    There is, of course, a special attachment for the carillon stops, but isn't there always?

    ReplyDelete
  25. As H.S.Truman said "The carillon stops here"

    ReplyDelete
  26. The bottom left one might produce interesting results.

    I would hate for anyone to say that we don't give John Ptak enough credit.

    ReplyDelete
  27. A real artist would have sliced the baby too.

    ReplyDelete
  28. You people can clearly not recognize a pipe organ transplant device. The cutout is for the organist, who must maintain the bellows during the procedure.

    There is, of course, a special attachment for the carillon stops, but isn't there always?


    We've secretly replaced this organist's vox humana with vox clamantis, let's see if anyone notices...

    ReplyDelete