http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19712-evidence-that-we-can-see-the-future-to-be-published.html
As always, the prediction is maddeningly vague on crucial details like when it will be published.
The bottle is then riddled, so that the lees settles in the neck of the wine bottle... Manual riddling is still done for Prestige Cuvées in Champagne... mechanised riddling equipment (a gyropalette) is used instead. (Wikipedia)
It's like déjà vu all over again!
ReplyDeleteI knew you were going to post this.
ReplyDeleteI hope it's written in quatrains.
ReplyDeletelike when it will be published.
ReplyDeleteHeisenberg's uncertainty publishing,
you cannot know both that it will be published and when.
Experiment 1: Precognitive Detection of Erotic Stimuli
ReplyDeleteYou know, I could use some research into this area.
Sounds like fish is experienced with the vagaries of academic journals.
ReplyDeleteFrom Bem's paper:
ReplyDelete40 of the sessions comprised 12 trials using erotic pictures,
...using stronger and more explicit images from Internet sites for the men. We also provided two additional sets of erotic pictures so that men could choose the option of seeing male-male erotic images and women could choose the option of seeing female-female erotic images.
It does not require precognition to see the kind of hostile publicity he's going to receive when the rightwing culture warriors find out about his methods.
It may turn out that all your inappropriate boners were instead precognitive boners and you just DIDN'T CLUE IN.
ReplyDelete...timing is everything
ReplyDeleteThey even have the tools to convince a grand jury that even if you didn't do anything, you're still a fucking perv and need to be incarcerated...
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penile_plethysmograph
ReplyDeleteIt is hardly my fault if I am turned on by having pressure gauges or inflatable cuffs placed around my penis.
It is in fact the Frau Doktorin's fault, but you don't want to hear that story.