It follows from Rule 34 that given "porn of it", one should be able to work backwards and reverse-engineer the original, inspirational "it".The logic is geometric and unassailable... yet in this case the only output from the software is the 'Divide by Zero' warning.
8 comments:
Stacked Overflow...
pushing a rope....
Illegal Operation.
~
Segment access violation. Heap corruption.
Malformed Scuzzy chain.
Defenestrated Windows.
It has belatedly occurred to me that there is a flaw in my logic -- I have assumed that the operation 'IsPornOf(x)' has an inverse operation, i.e. that the Intertubes has the properties of a group.
But suppose the Interlattice is a ring?
That's what I was thinking.
Post a Comment