Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Icarus flew too near the sun
Into the blue his red wax did run

Franz Radziwill was not clear on some details of the Icarus mythogem.



He was not alone in this. Some Farangist duckspeaker at the Torygraph had a brainfart, and contributed to the gaiety of nations by retelling the story with a revisionist account of Icarus' construction materials:
"hand-made wings fashioned from wood, feathers and wax."
Also this revisionist version is Hubris-free; not a single Hubri is mentioned.

Now the rules of the Riddled Icarus Reenactment Club are quite clear: all entrants in the Closeness-to-the-Sun Trophy must construct their wings using only feathers and wax, as originally laid down by Ovid and Pseudo-Apollodorus. Otherwise it'll be open slather and hi-tech, all carbon fibre and monolayer boron-nitride, and the focus of the event would shift from human performance to technological innovation. Any wood means instant disqualification, as Swearing Bob discovered in last year's regatta. Space-Time Eddie was equally confused, but he confined himself to feathers and wax so he was not technically disqualified, although the Trojan horse he constructed out of them did not get very far off the ground.


Here's Breugel (Radziwill's inspiration) keeping it real.

Friday, September 13, 2019

The bolt is sliding in its groove;
Outside the window is the black remov-
-ers' van;
And now with sudden swift emergence
Come the hooded women, the hump-backed surgeons,
And the Scissor Man.

W.H. Auden actually wrote "The Two" / "The Witnesses" (1932) as lyrics for a bonus track on "The Sky's Gone Out", but sadly he was nearly 50 years too early for Bauhaus to get together, so the project never came to fruition. Not many people know that.

This discovery was inspired by my need for a Arthur Conan Doyle / Heinrich Hoffmann collaboration in which Sherlock Holmes solves the case of the "Suck-a-Thumb Engineer".


Thursday, September 12, 2019

There's only one course of action
Left for me to take
I've tried every switch selection
That might control this state
I think for my protection
I better make it straight
Into RETRACTION

This post was earlier cross-posted at Leonid Schneider's site, hence the nonfrivolity and Explaining Voice. The version there is improved by Leonid's frame story and editing.

I have a nostalgic fondness for the work from Mi-Cong Jin's group, having first encountered them in the context of Prashant Sharma and Rashmi Madhuri. Along with scamference impresario Ashutosh Tiwari, Sharma and Madhuri surveyed significant nanotechnology developments, in a Review Paper for Tony Turner's journal Biosensors & Bioelectronics (with Tiwari guest-editing, as Turner's protégé). Inter alia, they reprinted Figure 1 from "In situ controllable synthesis of graphene oxide-based ternary magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer hybrid for efficient enrichment and detection of eight microcystins" (for short, [4]). In 1(a), a score of perfectly uniform Fe3O4 nano-eggs have appeared on a leaf of graphene (GO). Perhaps they were laid there by a nanoscopic Iron Butterfly.


Now Photoshop compositions abound in the pictorial realm of nanotech illustration, so this development was not that significant. Pan, Zhao, Jin et al. are only minor offenders by the standards of that realm. What brings them out of comment threads and into our ambit here is a flurry of Errata accepted by the editors of Royal Society of Chemistry journals (Journal of Materials Chemistry A, RSC Advances, Analytical Methods), revising Figures and in one case the text of 2014-2017 papers (labelled [2], [3], [4], [7] in the Helpful Diagram below). These Errata provoked a series of tweets from F. X. Coudert.
"The authors apologise that parts of the data presented in Fig. 1 had been inappropriately modified using Photoshop to make the images more appealing. The authors apologise for this and understand that any type of image manipulation is not acceptable.
"The authors have repeated the experiments to provide replacement data for Fig. 1(b)–(f). The accuracy and integrity of the new data has been confirmed by the Director of the Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The new figures have been reviewed by a member of the journal’s Editorial Board and are provided below in order to fulfil the journal’s responsibility to correct the scientific record, in accordance with the guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). This correction does not alter the conclusions presented in this Journal of Materials Chemistry A paper."
The collective impression is of a Hans Christian Andersen fable, updated for Nanoscholars... "The Emperor's courtiers agreed that it is not standard scientific practice to forge illustrations of the Emperor's ultra-fine costume in Photoshop. In return for this concession, the editors of Advances in Nanofabric and Journal of Imperial Tailoring allowed them to amend their papers with better illustrations, photoshopped more skillfully and less obviously."

Now the collective goals of these papers are worthy -- to detect industrial pollutants in food and the environment, and to sequestrate them, by the power of nanoparticulate magic (these goals may be especially salient in an economy marked by non-regulation and rapid development). It would not be fair to compare Pan, Jin et al. to the venal careerist charlatans populating this field. I am happy to believe that they set out with good intentions and high ambitions, and performed many of the procedures they describe, before encountering the sad fact that they chose a methodology where the only way to replicate and extend the results of earlier researchers is to fake them.

In particular, this set of papers feature the 'template / grafting' approach to nano-level chemical mensuration. Here a polymer coating is applied to the surface of nanoparticles, riddled with cavities in the shape of the molecule of interest, so that on environmental exposure, ambient molecules fall into the cavities and get stuck. Later they can be shaken loose and counted, resetting the nanoparticulate booby-traps ready to repeat the process. The specificity of those cavities can range from a single molecule to a wide range. Now I am not saying that this is arrant cargo-cult nonsense, nor that every published application of this paradigm was fabricated. I do want to say that 'template' papers dominate the prodigiously falsified production from Bhim Bali Prasad.


Anyway, here is the Helpful Diagram. [4] is the keystone of this scheme (as well as my point of entry into the oeuvre), so there I begin, before the readers grow bored. It will be a short but bumpy ride so strap yourselves in.


We have already encountered Fig 1(a). The photocloning was not as intensive in Fig 1(c), this time depicting T-MMIPs (the Ternary Magnetic Molecularly Imprinted Polymer hybrids of the title). Yet close inspection shows their numbers to have multiplied, appearing more numerous than they really are, as if to to deter other nano-butterflies from laying there. Devoid of nano-enhancements, the Scanning Electron Microscopy image (SEM) reappeared in [5] as Fig 5(b) and 5(c): overlapping enlargements, there identified as "double-sided magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer modified graphene oxide (DS-MMIP@GO)".



Continuing with Fig 1, small photocloned platoons of GO-Fe3O4 and T-MMIP particles assemble in panels (e) and (f) respectively, now depicted with Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Their parade-ground is a single creased film of graphene, scrubbed clean before each use. The magnetite dots in 1(e) are almost featureless with only a flattened edge to betray their identity. The MMIPs in 1(f) appear to be protruding the tips of their tongues in concentration.


Two points are worth noting here. First, these are not the first appearances of that graphene-film backdrop. It served the same role in Fig 1(f) of [2] and Fig 1(b) of [3], but in those cases it supported masses of frog spawn (or maybe tapioca balls). No, I tell a lie, they were really core–shell magnetic polymers imprinted to bind pentachlorophenol, or 2,4,6-trichlorophenol as the case may be. We'll come back to [2] and [3] shortly.


Second, the original of the tongue-producing MMIPs of 1(f) can be found in Fig 4(a) of [6], "Fe3O4@SiO2". I want to adorn it with ears and googly eyes and turn it into the head of a French bulldog doing a Blep.

The Blep-particle (in isolation or en masse) is not all that ties [4] and [6] together. Consider these SEM images. A nanopellet of GO-Fe3O4 in melancholy isolation, or an identical triplet of Fe3O4@SiO2? An alert reviewer or editor might have wondered about the identical nipple displayed on each sphere. The background texture is unchanged but the metadata at the bottom of the frames alleges a different magnification.



The suspicion that they are really nano-Tribbles is strengthened by the discovery of Fig 3(f) from [7], identifying them as "core-shell MD-CS-MMIPs"; the scale has changed but they have multiplied again and they are spilling off the edge of the frame.


We haven't yet finished with [7] for it allows us tie to everything together, and to return to [2] and [3] as promised. Please compare the bonus tapioca below. We have already seen Fig 1(f) from [2], at left, but the same frog-eggs appear at right in Fig 3(d) from [7], as "core-shell MD-CS-MMIP using appropriate amount of oleic acid".


The eggs so far have been rather undisciplined in their parade-ground drill. I am relieved to see them in more serried ranks as 1(b) of [3] and 1(d) of [2], without the graphene backdrop, more tightly packed in the latter but with exactly the same alignments for the individual ova in both versions.


A close examination of the ova removes any lingering doubt: these images are complete Photoshop confections, constructed from elements that are identical apart from rotation.

But according to the Errata these instances were not de-novo creations, instead falling under the rubric of mere image beautification. Moreover, the authors have reenacted the process of synthesising and characterising the materials, this time under the supervision of "the Director of the Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention" (as their colleague and supervisor, and beneficiary of the Center's raised profile, he or she is a disinterested observer and devoid of complicity).

The Ningbo Director could be any of this list (provided by Tiger BB8).

A few more links remain among the seven papers. The faults (if they are faults) are less grievous, involving duplicated illustrations and plots, which can occur by accident and are easily corrected, rather than willful fabrications.

The different materials in [2] and [3] produced identical FTIR spectra, down to pixels of noise. This, apparently, was due to unnamed outside analysts who were sent the raw data for plotting, and who sent back the wrong results, replicating an earlier file.


The different materials in [2] and [4] produced identical XRD patterns, down to the last pixel of noise. This, apparently, was due to unnamed outside analysts (perhaps different ones) who were sent the raw data for plotting, and who sent back the wrong results, replicating an earlier file.


A second replicated XRD pattern emerged from the materials in [4] and [7]. Indeed, the identical pattern had already been reported from mercury-absorbent "Surface mercapto engineered magnetic Fe3O4" nanoparticles in a 2012 study (down to the pixels of noise), accounting for the presence of [1] in the time-line.



Fluorescence spectroscopy was a third specialty where the authors did not feel confident of their own abilities, again outsourcing the analysis and plotting of the raw data. Again, erroneous results were returned, resulting in the quadruplicated spectra in [2], [3], [4] and [6].



The authors are unable to recommend the Acme Spectroscopy Corporation.


Equally minor issues of image recycling have inspired Pubpeer threads for a few more papers from the group. For instance, the identical nanoparticles in [8] and [9]. Note that I am no longer numbering references in chronological sequence, and these papers book-end the whole collection, dating from 2010 and 2018. The authors deserve commendations for preserving their research results for so long, even if their labelling system leaves much to be desired.

Larger clusters of particles from [10] and [11] reappear in [12].



Left as an exercise for the reader
But it is time to stop before my hyper-critical pettiness grows too evident. As noted, these issues are trivial and easily corrected; I am not calling for the papers to be court-martialled, stripped of their epaulettes and reduced to the ranks.

But what of the 'main sequence' of papers, from [1] to [7]? Were the journal editors right to accept the authors' explanations for the 'enhancements', their promises to go forth and sin no more, and their offers of unenhanced replacement illustrations? F. X. Coudert is not the only observer to raise his eyebrows in dismay. I am not offering advice to the editors (and they're unlikely to take it if I did). Suffice to say that the flurry of Errata coincided with the Retraction of [6] from Analytica Chimica Acta. When an Elsevier journal displays greater concern for the integrity of the literature, it is time for those RSC editors to think long and hard about the poor life decisions that led them to where they are now.

[1]. Shengdong Pan, Haoyu Shen, Qihong Xu, Jian Luo, Meiqin Hu (2012), "Surface mercapto engineered magnetic Fe3O4 nanoadsorbent for the removal of mercury from aqueous solutions".
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science doi: doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.002 [Pubpeer].

[2]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Hao-Yu Shen , Li-Xin Zhou , Xiao-Hong Chen , Yong-Gang Zhao , Mei-Qiang Cai , Mi-Cong Jin (2014), "Controlled synthesis of pentachlorophenol-imprinted polymers on the surface of magnetic graphene oxide for highly selective adsorption".
Journal of Materials Chemistry A doi: 10.1039/c4ta02600d [Pubpeer].

[3]. Mei-Lan Chen, Jian-Qing Min, Sheng-Dong Pan, Mi-Cong Jin (2014), "Surface core–shell magnetic polymer modified graphene oxide-based material for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal".
RSC Advances doi: 10.1039/c4ra14150d [Pubpeer].

[4]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Xiao-Hong Chen , Xiao-Ping Li , Mei-Qiang Cai , Hao-Yu Shen , Yong-Gang Zhao , Mi-Cong Jin (2015), "In situ controllable synthesis of graphene oxide-based ternary magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer hybrid for efficient enrichment and detection of eight microcystins".
Journal of Materials Chemistry A doi: 10.1039/c5ta05840f [Pubpeer].

[5]. Sheng-Dong Pan, Xiao-Hong Chen, Xiao-Ping Li, Mei-Qiang Cai, Hao-Yu Shen, Yong-Gang Zhao, Mi-Cong Jin (2015), "Double-sided magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer modified graphene oxide for highly efficient enrichment and fast detection of trace-level microcystins from large-volume water samples combined with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry".
Journal of Chromatography A doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.007 [Pubpeer].

[6]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Xiao-Hong Chen , Hao-Yu Shen , Xiao-Ping Li , Mei-Qiang Cai , Yong-Gang Zhao , Mi-Cong Jin (2016), "Rapid and effective sample cleanup based on graphene oxide-encapsulated core–shell magnetic microspheres for determination of fifteen trace environmental phenols in seafood by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry".
Analytica Chimica Acta doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.035 [Pubpeer].

[7]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Mei-Jun Ye , Guo-Sheng Gao , Qian He , Li Wang , Xiao-Hong Chen , Qiao-Li Qiu , Mi-Cong Jin (2017), "Synthesis of a monodisperse well-defined core–shell magnetic molecularly-imprinted polymer prior to LC-MS/MS for fast and sensitive determination of mycotoxin residues in rice".
Analytical Methods doi: 10.1039/c7ay01444a [Pubpeer].

[8]. Yong-Gang Zhao, Hao-Yu Shen, Sheng-Dong Pan, Mei-Qin Hu (2010), "Synthesis, characterization and properties of ethylenediamine-functionalized Fe3O4 magnetic polymers for removal of Cr(VI) in wastewater".
Journal of Hazardous Materials doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.029 [Pubpeer].

[9]. Haoyu Shen , Meina Sun , Meiqin Hu , Jinjin Cheng (2018), "Design and controllable synthesis of ethylenediamine-grafted ion imprinted magnetic polymers for highly selective adsorption to perchlorate".
RSC Advances doi: 10.1039/c8ra06085a [Pubpeer].

[10]. Xiao-Hong Chen, Yong-Gang Zhao, Hao-Yu Shen, Mi-Cong Jin (2012), "Application of dispersive solid-phase extraction and ultra-fast liquid chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry in food additive residue analysis of red wine".
Journal of Chromatography A doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.074

[11]. Yong-Gang Zhao, Xiao-Hong Chen, Sheng-Dong Pan, Hao Zhu, Hao-Yu Shen, Mi-Cong Jin (2013), "Self-assembly of a surface bisphenol A-imprinted core–shell nanoring amino-functionalized superparamagnetic polymer".
Journal of Materials Chemistry A doi: 10.1039/c3ta12488f [Pubpeer].

[12]. Xiao-Hong Chen, Yong-Gang Zhao, Hao-Yu Shen, Li-Xin Zhou, Sheng-Dong Pan, Mi-Cong Jin (2014), "Fast determination of seven synthetic pigments from wine and soft drinks using magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry".
Journal of Chromatography A doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.060 [Pubpeer]

Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Friday, August 30, 2019

Halifax explosion

This post was earlier cross-posted at Leonid Schneider's site, hence the nonfrivolity and Explaining Voice (and the images reduced to nigh-invisibility here). The version there is improved by Leonid's frame story and editing.

Watch closely now, as I transform a Western blot of p21 protein blobs into a band of "Total p53", and an Actin loading control into a different one, using only control enhancement and a horizontal flip! You'll notice that at no time through the proceedings do my hands leave my wrists [Milligan 1972]. It is an unparalleled feat of prestidigitation, performed to great acclamation before the crowned heads of Europe, such as you will see nowhere else... unless you read decade-old cell biology journals, and particularly Hall et al (2008a) [1] and Hall et al (2008b) [2].


In total that Actin control band makes four appearances. It also illustrated Hall et al (2008c) [3], in a similar role. Then in 2013 the authors of [2] provided a Corrigendum to correct the excessive re-use of illustrations from [3], amending Figures 1, 4, 5 and 7 (which might not reach the threshold of what the RetractionWatch observers call a "mega-correction", but is a "macro-correction" at the very least). The Actin band vanished from Figure 5A, but rose again in its fourth incarnation (truncated to three lanes and repurposed for a different set of conditions) within the new Fig 1D*.


Further displays of legerdemain await readers who care to examine the appropriate PubPeer threads... for instance, other concerns with the new Fig 1D*. I wrote this (as is the custom of my people) by strip-mining those threads and others, and by cherry-picking the low-hanging fruit in an unfortunate pile-up of metallurgical and horticultural metaphors, so it is not meant to be exhaustive. Admire, in passing, the similarities of three streaks of mRNA expression, from the '0-hour' conditions of different experiments (after adjusting for lightness):



Some of the critiques of [2] involved Figures reused from [3] with different lanes or labels in the reuse, so they were preempted by the 2013 Corrigendum. Others were not.



So far we have looked at a remarkable trilogy from the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Dalhousie University, Halifax (a city best-known for exploding, a century ago). By the time of Hill et al (2013) [4] the group had acquired second affiliations with the University of Algarve (on the south coast of Portugal), while following the same policy: repurposing protein bands from Western blots into new ones as evidence that experiments had indeed occurred. Often the bands were flipped vertically or horizontally, which had the unintended side-effect of making the re-use less apparent.




Now in electrophoresis commentary, one school of thought holds that loading controls are no big deal, because researchers can be confident that their cell-lysate preparations reliably contain the same total amount of protein. So it is fine if they do not bother with controls in an experiment, and fake them later while preparing a Figure (to grudgingly assuage the Third Reviewer's unreasonable demands), cutting out the necessary number of lanes from any old source, like strips of wallpaper. Like this:


It is harder to be complaisant when the conjuring trick of inversion turns one protein into another.

Skipping a few years brings us to Hill et al (2017) [5]. By now Professor Lee had retired and the Dalhousie team had dispersed... or at any rate, relocated to University of Algarve. The proteinaceous transformations continued, reaching new heights of exuberance. The authors display an open-minded acceptance or even permissiveness towards their slices of gel: if one chooses to identify as AKT or β-actin rather than FOX03a why stand in its way?


TRIB2, I'd like to introduce you to pSER253-FOX03a... but I see you've already met.


The number of pairs of duplicated bands in Figure 2(c) (the doubling variously concealed by rescaling, darkening or horizontal flips) exhausts the number of colors available to show their kinship.


Figure 4(e) is intimidating in its scale but at least one dup triplication emerges from its murky depths.

The innovation in [5] is the provision of Supplementary Information files containing raw data - the original Western Blot gels (full-size and un-retouched) from which the in-text illustrations came as cleaned-up excerpts. Alas, these raw-data files are lower-resolution than those image files in the text. More to the point, they mirror the in-text duplications.

The charitable impulse when one finds an image repeated in a paper to illustrate different results is to think "Someone accidentally chose the wrong panel while assembling a complex Figure", but this "carelessness" interpretation is not an option when 'raw gels' have been created by flipping and selectively cropping an original, and changing the labels on the lanes.



By 2019, regular first author Richard Hill had found a permanent post as Senior Research Fellow at Portsmouth University, so I think of these last two papers as the Portsmouth Diptych: Mihajluk et al (2019) [6] and Howarth et al (2019) [7]. They are linked by an Actin loading band, serving to equalise overall protein concentration across different sets of conditions in independent studies of two wholly-different proteins. Is there nothing that a horizontal flip can't accomplish?


Dr Hill's photographs on the Portsmouth University website are chosen to convey a sense of concentration and brooding intensity. I am left wondering whether one of the Midwich Cuckoos survived the explosive denouement of that novel and went on to a successful career in cell-biology research.

[6] and [7] are subdued in comparison with [5] but one still finds blotty duplicates working double-time to illustrate different experiments. Again, the duplications are paralleled by the fabrication of flipped, selectively-cropped "original unretouched gels" in the Supplementary Data files, so they are unlikely to be accidental. [7] is of special interest because there the fabrication was in the service of a patent application for a new class of anti-cancer drugs, filed by "Opal Oncology Ltd." (a company founded by co-author Morley).




To compensate for that lack of exuberance, I violated chronological sequence and left the best until last. Prepare yourself for Hill et al (2011) [8]. In fact we saw its Figure 1A already, as the lower half of a comparison with [4], but the majority of the linkages are internal. They are completely over-the-top, with splicing within bands on top of the insouciant recycling.


'Condylocarpon Amazonicum' commended the Supplementary Data file to the readers' attention. It is a Blot Bacchanalia.







Protein bands cavort and caper, tumbling and swapping faces like figures in the marginalia of medieval manuscripts, or like the unleashed familiars in 'The Downfall of Hermogenes'.

How this Western Walpurgisnacht was ever accepted for publication is anyone's guess. Perhaps Dr Hill used his Cuckoo mind-control powers on the Oncotarget editors and peer-reviewers.

[8] could serve as an educational resource for would-be contributors to PubPeer, to train them gradually in spotting blot manipulations or repurposing, for the shenanigans are not well-concealed and there is nothing too challenging for the untrained eye. Proving in passing that whatever its detractors might say, Oncotarget can play a useful role in the scientific literature.

Developments after the cross-posting at Leonid's site include:
  1. The promise of a retraction of [8].
  2. Coverage of that retraction at RetractionWatch.
  3. Further PubPeer scrutiny of [5].
  4. An investigation at Portsmouth University.
  5. Disappearance of a Portsmouth University press release and Faceborg page.


SOURCES (frequent names in bold)

[1] "p53 Binding to the p21 promoter is dependent on the nature of DNA damage". Cell cycle (2008) doi: 10.4161/cc.7.16.6440
Richard Hill, Michael D. Bodzak , Patrick W.K. Blough , Patrick W.K. Lee [Pubpeer]

[2] "Chromium-mediated apoptosis: involvement of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and differential induction of p53 target genes". DNA Repair (2008) doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.05.007
Richard Hill , Andrew M. Leidal , Patricia A. Madureira , Laura D. Gillis , David M. Waisman , Arthur Chiu , Patrick W.K. Lee [Pubpeer]

[3] "Hypersensitivity to chromium-induced DNA damage correlates with constitutive deregulation of upstream p53 kinases in p21−/− HCT116 colon cancer cells". DNA Repair (2008) doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.10.001
Richard Hill , Andrew M. Leidal , Patricia A. Madureira , Laura D. Gillis , Haley K. Cochrane , David. M. Waisman , Arthur Chiu , Patrick W.K. Lee [Pubpeer]

[4] "Gemcitabine-mediated tumour regression and p53-dependent gene expression: implications for colon and pancreatic cancer therapy". Cell Death and Disease (2013) doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.307
R Hill, M Rabb, P A Madureira, D Clements, S A Gujar, D M Waisman, C A Giacomantonio, P W K Lee [Pubpeer]

[5] "TRIB2 confers resistance to anti-cancer therapy by activating the serine/threonine protein kinase AKT". Nature Communications (2017)
Richard Hill, Patricia A. Madureira, Bibiana Ferreira, Inês Baptista, Susana Machado, Laura Colaço, Marta Dos Santos, Ningshu Liu, Ana Dopazo, Selma Ugurel, Angyal Adrienn, Endre Kiss-Toth, Murat Isbilen, Ali O. Gure, Wolfgang Link [Pubpeer]

[6] "IP1867B suppresses the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) ablating epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor resistance in adult high grade gliomas". Cancer Letters (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.05.028
K. Mihajluk , C. Simms , M. Reay , P.A. Madureira , A. Howarth , P. Murray , S. Nasser , C.A. Duckworth , D.M. Pritchard , G.J. Pilkington , R. Hill [Pubpeer]

[7] "DIVERSet JAG Compounds Inhibit Topoisomerase II and Are Effective Against Adult and Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas". Translational Oncology (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.07.007
Alison Howarth , Claire Simms , Nitesh Kerai , Olivia Allen , Karina Mihajluk , Patricia A. Madureira , Giannis Sokratous , Simon Cragg , Sang Y. Lee , Andy D. Morley , Ashkan Keyoumars , Paul A. Cox , Geoffrey J. Pilkington , Richard Hill [Pubpeer]

[8] "DNA-PKCS binding to p53 on the p21WAF1/CIP1 promoter blocks transcription resulting in cell death". Oncotarget (2011) doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.378
Richard Hill, Patricia A. Madureira, David M Waisman, Patrick W.K. Lee [Pubpeer]