Showing posts with label salted pineapple trade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label salted pineapple trade. Show all posts

Friday, March 19, 2021

Crisis actors of Busytown

Collateral impact
One of our duties here at the Riddled Research Laboratory and Reality Maintenance Studio is removing on-line copies of the First Encyclopedia of Tlön [Orbis Tertius]. The Library Pixies handle this responsibility, in their own way. sometimes with collateral impact on those persons who ill-advisedly uploaded the Encyclopedia.

The concern, of course, is that W*k*pedia editors would amplify their Wikientries with passages copy-pasted from the Encyclopedia, soon to be followed by the uncredited appearances of those passages in blogs and discussion boards and Pinterest pages, providing those Wikientries with independent sources of corroboration. Each iteration of copy-pasta nudges the Encyclopedia contents one rung up the Ladder of Ontological Status towards the happy state of 'Stuff that Everyone Knows', and then we would be over-run with invisible tigers and towers of blood and Hrönir of the third and thirteenth order, and small cones of an unknown metal of preternatural density, and schools would be invaded by the (conjectural) "primitive language" of Tlön.
Diligently following a camel around
In a related partial irruption from an alternative existence into our own, my campaign against the "Camel-poop-cures-dysentery" hoax has developed not necessarily to my advantage. Academic authors were already retailing the fable by the time that W*k*pedia dropped its wholesale distribution. It turns out that academics are loath to listen when you inform them that they credulously fell for a hoax, and the chances of squeezing that particular genie back into the toothpaste tube have, like Murphy's conarium, "shrunk to nothing".

The camel-poop invention links in turn (via click-bait churnalism) to the 'camel poop bomb' story dreamed up by Jasper Maskelyne ("war magician" and self-promoting fabulist), as fodder for click-bait churnalists.
Camel "apples" became a good luck charm for the German military. The Allies discovered their habit of intentionally running tanks over piles of the droppings for good luck. So the Allies developed and planted land mines that looked like camel dung! When the Germans caught on to the trick, they began to avoid fresh piles of camel manure. In turn, the Allies caught on and began to make mines that looked like camel dung that had already been run over by a tank and therefore seemed safe enough to a Nazi driver. Genius.
Maskelyne contributed more to the Allied war effort in North Africa than any other man including Monty (in his account), or was a skiving credit-grabbing waste of a pair of boots (according to everyone else). Also a waste of a name that was clearly intended for a Jack Vance character. So the movie...

Possible film adaptations[edit]

In 2003, director Peter Weir and actor Tom Cruise were working on a film based on The War Magician.[21] When questions rose about how much of The War Magician was factual and how much was invented by the author, the project was dropped while still in pre-production.[21]

In 2015 Benedict Cumberbatch was reported as signing on to play the lead role in a Maskelyne film.[22] At the time, the project was pending the selection of a director.[22]


Excuse me for the interruption. Any movie could become a gullible parade through Maskelyne's Munchausen memoires, or a more interesting parallax-view contrast between his Walter-Mitty fantasies and consensus reality. The absence of Terry Gilliam and Werner Herzog from the director's chair does not fill me with anticipation.

I also fess up to skepticism about the presence of an anthropomorphic hyaena photographer, Ngorongoro Crater, as a denizen of Richard Scarry's "Busytown". Let alone a terrier named after a Disney animator.

John Parr Miller: A terrier at the town party, apparently a chef, named after a Disney animator who then moved into illustration of children's books.
Ngorongoro Crater: A hyena who is a photographer and whose camera gets a parking ticket.

Both made their way into the 'Minor Characters' subsection of the Whackyweedia Busytown entry on 11 July 2018, when fine upstanding Wikicitizen 'Swiss Frank' added one-line encapsulations of these previously-overlooked characters. The existence of Ngorongoro Crater was subsequently attested by wikisourced copy-paste affixed to Busytown-related Pinterest entries, albeit unaccompanied by corroboratory images, so I remain a Busytown Truther. But no-one ever listens to Uncle Smut.

That should probably become a blogpost label.

Saturday, January 11, 2020

Magazine Madonna

This is not a promising beginning to 2020. An actress and Alt-Med bafflegab grifter presented herself as the Blessed Virgin Mary, under the banner of "Falling for magical-thinking scams = Female Empowerment".


It goes without saying that there is a backstory to this Vesica-Piscis / Mandorla tradition in Marian iconography. Early christian artists had adopted the motif of a full-body aureole from Buddhist artists, in the same way that they'd borrowed the head-centred aureole (whence cometh halos). Then the theoreticians and commissars of Formalised State Art ret-conned a rationale, borrowing the Vesica Piscis image from Pythagorean and Neo-Platonist thought to symbolise the Intersection of Realms of Existence.


It was totally not because of Another Kiwi taking the Riddled Time Machine back to the Council of Choronzon in C.E. 397 in search of fresh dates for the Christmas Ale, and offering the locals his old 1960s New Maths textbooks (with all the Venn diagrams) in exchange.*

Those early artists ignored the religious-symbolism potential of Venn's 4-class diagram, so we are in a position to re-sell it to other traditions. Anyone who wants the Four Overlapping Ellipses to become an emblem in the iconography of their preferred religion, talk to Another Kiwi in the Wigglesworth Lounge any night at the Old Entomologist and offer him a bag of dates. Just not $cientology. Also, not 397, it triggers his camel allergy.

There is room for argument on how far those early artists were aware of the Yoni symbolism of the conventions they developed. Hans Bellmer certainly thought about it for his illustrations for 'Madame Edwina'.

* The Whackyweedia entry on Venn diagrams (as elaborations of Euler diagrams) traces the trail of prefigurements back to Leibnitz and Llull... but not to the Neo-Platonists chiz chiz.

Thursday, September 12, 2019

There's only one course of action
Left for me to take
I've tried every switch selection
That might control this state
I think for my protection
I better make it straight
Into RETRACTION

This post was earlier cross-posted at Leonid Schneider's site, hence the nonfrivolity and Explaining Voice. The version there is improved by Leonid's frame story and editing.

I have a nostalgic fondness for the work from Mi-Cong Jin's group, having first encountered them in the context of Prashant Sharma and Rashmi Madhuri. Along with scamference impresario Ashutosh Tiwari, Sharma and Madhuri surveyed significant nanotechnology developments, in a Review Paper for Tony Turner's journal Biosensors & Bioelectronics (with Tiwari guest-editing, as Turner's protégé). Inter alia, they reprinted Figure 1 from "In situ controllable synthesis of graphene oxide-based ternary magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer hybrid for efficient enrichment and detection of eight microcystins" (for short, [4]). In 1(a), a score of perfectly uniform Fe3O4 nano-eggs have appeared on a leaf of graphene (GO). Perhaps they were laid there by a nanoscopic Iron Butterfly.


Now Photoshop compositions abound in the pictorial realm of nanotech illustration, so this development was not that significant. Pan, Zhao, Jin et al. are only minor offenders by the standards of that realm. What brings them out of comment threads and into our ambit here is a flurry of Errata accepted by the editors of Royal Society of Chemistry journals (Journal of Materials Chemistry A, RSC Advances, Analytical Methods), revising Figures and in one case the text of 2014-2017 papers (labelled [2], [3], [4], [7] in the Helpful Diagram below). These Errata provoked a series of tweets from F. X. Coudert.
"The authors apologise that parts of the data presented in Fig. 1 had been inappropriately modified using Photoshop to make the images more appealing. The authors apologise for this and understand that any type of image manipulation is not acceptable.
"The authors have repeated the experiments to provide replacement data for Fig. 1(b)–(f). The accuracy and integrity of the new data has been confirmed by the Director of the Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The new figures have been reviewed by a member of the journal’s Editorial Board and are provided below in order to fulfil the journal’s responsibility to correct the scientific record, in accordance with the guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). This correction does not alter the conclusions presented in this Journal of Materials Chemistry A paper."
The collective impression is of a Hans Christian Andersen fable, updated for Nanoscholars... "The Emperor's courtiers agreed that it is not standard scientific practice to forge illustrations of the Emperor's ultra-fine costume in Photoshop. In return for this concession, the editors of Advances in Nanofabric and Journal of Imperial Tailoring allowed them to amend their papers with better illustrations, photoshopped more skillfully and less obviously."

Now the collective goals of these papers are worthy -- to detect industrial pollutants in food and the environment, and to sequestrate them, by the power of nanoparticulate magic (these goals may be especially salient in an economy marked by non-regulation and rapid development). It would not be fair to compare Pan, Jin et al. to the venal careerist charlatans populating this field. I am happy to believe that they set out with good intentions and high ambitions, and performed many of the procedures they describe, before encountering the sad fact that they chose a methodology where the only way to replicate and extend the results of earlier researchers is to fake them.

In particular, this set of papers feature the 'template / grafting' approach to nano-level chemical mensuration. Here a polymer coating is applied to the surface of nanoparticles, riddled with cavities in the shape of the molecule of interest, so that on environmental exposure, ambient molecules fall into the cavities and get stuck. Later they can be shaken loose and counted, resetting the nanoparticulate booby-traps ready to repeat the process. The specificity of those cavities can range from a single molecule to a wide range. Now I am not saying that this is arrant cargo-cult nonsense, nor that every published application of this paradigm was fabricated. I do want to say that 'template' papers dominate the prodigiously falsified production from Bhim Bali Prasad.


Anyway, here is the Helpful Diagram. [4] is the keystone of this scheme (as well as my point of entry into the oeuvre), so there I begin, before the readers grow bored. It will be a short but bumpy ride so strap yourselves in.


We have already encountered Fig 1(a). The photocloning was not as intensive in Fig 1(c), this time depicting T-MMIPs (the Ternary Magnetic Molecularly Imprinted Polymer hybrids of the title). Yet close inspection shows their numbers to have multiplied, appearing more numerous than they really are, as if to to deter other nano-butterflies from laying there. Devoid of nano-enhancements, the Scanning Electron Microscopy image (SEM) reappeared in [5] as Fig 5(b) and 5(c): overlapping enlargements, there identified as "double-sided magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer modified graphene oxide (DS-MMIP@GO)".



Continuing with Fig 1, small photocloned platoons of GO-Fe3O4 and T-MMIP particles assemble in panels (e) and (f) respectively, now depicted with Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Their parade-ground is a single creased film of graphene, scrubbed clean before each use. The magnetite dots in 1(e) are almost featureless with only a flattened edge to betray their identity. The MMIPs in 1(f) appear to be protruding the tips of their tongues in concentration.


Two points are worth noting here. First, these are not the first appearances of that graphene-film backdrop. It served the same role in Fig 1(f) of [2] and Fig 1(b) of [3], but in those cases it supported masses of frog spawn (or maybe tapioca balls). No, I tell a lie, they were really core–shell magnetic polymers imprinted to bind pentachlorophenol, or 2,4,6-trichlorophenol as the case may be. We'll come back to [2] and [3] shortly.


Second, the original of the tongue-producing MMIPs of 1(f) can be found in Fig 4(a) of [6], "Fe3O4@SiO2". I want to adorn it with ears and googly eyes and turn it into the head of a French bulldog doing a Blep.

The Blep-particle (in isolation or en masse) is not all that ties [4] and [6] together. Consider these SEM images. A nanopellet of GO-Fe3O4 in melancholy isolation, or an identical triplet of Fe3O4@SiO2? An alert reviewer or editor might have wondered about the identical nipple displayed on each sphere. The background texture is unchanged but the metadata at the bottom of the frames alleges a different magnification.



The suspicion that they are really nano-Tribbles is strengthened by the discovery of Fig 3(f) from [7], identifying them as "core-shell MD-CS-MMIPs"; the scale has changed but they have multiplied again and they are spilling off the edge of the frame.


We haven't yet finished with [7] for it allows us tie to everything together, and to return to [2] and [3] as promised. Please compare the bonus tapioca below. We have already seen Fig 1(f) from [2], at left, but the same frog-eggs appear at right in Fig 3(d) from [7], as "core-shell MD-CS-MMIP using appropriate amount of oleic acid".


The eggs so far have been rather undisciplined in their parade-ground drill. I am relieved to see them in more serried ranks as 1(b) of [3] and 1(d) of [2], without the graphene backdrop, more tightly packed in the latter but with exactly the same alignments for the individual ova in both versions.


A close examination of the ova removes any lingering doubt: these images are complete Photoshop confections, constructed from elements that are identical apart from rotation.

But according to the Errata these instances were not de-novo creations, instead falling under the rubric of mere image beautification. Moreover, the authors have reenacted the process of synthesising and characterising the materials, this time under the supervision of "the Director of the Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention" (as their colleague and supervisor, and beneficiary of the Center's raised profile, he or she is a disinterested observer and devoid of complicity).

The Ningbo Director could be any of this list (provided by Tiger BB8).

A few more links remain among the seven papers. The faults (if they are faults) are less grievous, involving duplicated illustrations and plots, which can occur by accident and are easily corrected, rather than willful fabrications.

The different materials in [2] and [3] produced identical FTIR spectra, down to pixels of noise. This, apparently, was due to unnamed outside analysts who were sent the raw data for plotting, and who sent back the wrong results, replicating an earlier file.


The different materials in [2] and [4] produced identical XRD patterns, down to the last pixel of noise. This, apparently, was due to unnamed outside analysts (perhaps different ones) who were sent the raw data for plotting, and who sent back the wrong results, replicating an earlier file.


A second replicated XRD pattern emerged from the materials in [4] and [7]. Indeed, the identical pattern had already been reported from mercury-absorbent "Surface mercapto engineered magnetic Fe3O4" nanoparticles in a 2012 study (down to the pixels of noise), accounting for the presence of [1] in the time-line.



Fluorescence spectroscopy was a third specialty where the authors did not feel confident of their own abilities, again outsourcing the analysis and plotting of the raw data. Again, erroneous results were returned, resulting in the quadruplicated spectra in [2], [3], [4] and [6].



The authors are unable to recommend the Acme Spectroscopy Corporation.


Equally minor issues of image recycling have inspired Pubpeer threads for a few more papers from the group. For instance, the identical nanoparticles in [8] and [9]. Note that I am no longer numbering references in chronological sequence, and these papers book-end the whole collection, dating from 2010 and 2018. The authors deserve commendations for preserving their research results for so long, even if their labelling system leaves much to be desired.

Larger clusters of particles from [10] and [11] reappear in [12].



Left as an exercise for the reader
But it is time to stop before my hyper-critical pettiness grows too evident. As noted, these issues are trivial and easily corrected; I am not calling for the papers to be court-martialled, stripped of their epaulettes and reduced to the ranks.

But what of the 'main sequence' of papers, from [1] to [7]? Were the journal editors right to accept the authors' explanations for the 'enhancements', their promises to go forth and sin no more, and their offers of unenhanced replacement illustrations? F. X. Coudert is not the only observer to raise his eyebrows in dismay. I am not offering advice to the editors (and they're unlikely to take it if I did). Suffice to say that the flurry of Errata coincided with the Retraction of [6] from Analytica Chimica Acta. When an Elsevier journal displays greater concern for the integrity of the literature, it is time for those RSC editors to think long and hard about the poor life decisions that led them to where they are now.

[1]. Shengdong Pan, Haoyu Shen, Qihong Xu, Jian Luo, Meiqin Hu (2012), "Surface mercapto engineered magnetic Fe3O4 nanoadsorbent for the removal of mercury from aqueous solutions".
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science doi: doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.09.002 [Pubpeer].

[2]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Hao-Yu Shen , Li-Xin Zhou , Xiao-Hong Chen , Yong-Gang Zhao , Mei-Qiang Cai , Mi-Cong Jin (2014), "Controlled synthesis of pentachlorophenol-imprinted polymers on the surface of magnetic graphene oxide for highly selective adsorption".
Journal of Materials Chemistry A doi: 10.1039/c4ta02600d [Pubpeer].

[3]. Mei-Lan Chen, Jian-Qing Min, Sheng-Dong Pan, Mi-Cong Jin (2014), "Surface core–shell magnetic polymer modified graphene oxide-based material for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal".
RSC Advances doi: 10.1039/c4ra14150d [Pubpeer].

[4]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Xiao-Hong Chen , Xiao-Ping Li , Mei-Qiang Cai , Hao-Yu Shen , Yong-Gang Zhao , Mi-Cong Jin (2015), "In situ controllable synthesis of graphene oxide-based ternary magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer hybrid for efficient enrichment and detection of eight microcystins".
Journal of Materials Chemistry A doi: 10.1039/c5ta05840f [Pubpeer].

[5]. Sheng-Dong Pan, Xiao-Hong Chen, Xiao-Ping Li, Mei-Qiang Cai, Hao-Yu Shen, Yong-Gang Zhao, Mi-Cong Jin (2015), "Double-sided magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer modified graphene oxide for highly efficient enrichment and fast detection of trace-level microcystins from large-volume water samples combined with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry".
Journal of Chromatography A doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.007 [Pubpeer].

[6]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Xiao-Hong Chen , Hao-Yu Shen , Xiao-Ping Li , Mei-Qiang Cai , Yong-Gang Zhao , Mi-Cong Jin (2016), "Rapid and effective sample cleanup based on graphene oxide-encapsulated core–shell magnetic microspheres for determination of fifteen trace environmental phenols in seafood by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry".
Analytica Chimica Acta doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.035 [Pubpeer].

[7]. Sheng-Dong Pan , Mei-Jun Ye , Guo-Sheng Gao , Qian He , Li Wang , Xiao-Hong Chen , Qiao-Li Qiu , Mi-Cong Jin (2017), "Synthesis of a monodisperse well-defined core–shell magnetic molecularly-imprinted polymer prior to LC-MS/MS for fast and sensitive determination of mycotoxin residues in rice".
Analytical Methods doi: 10.1039/c7ay01444a [Pubpeer].

[8]. Yong-Gang Zhao, Hao-Yu Shen, Sheng-Dong Pan, Mei-Qin Hu (2010), "Synthesis, characterization and properties of ethylenediamine-functionalized Fe3O4 magnetic polymers for removal of Cr(VI) in wastewater".
Journal of Hazardous Materials doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.029 [Pubpeer].

[9]. Haoyu Shen , Meina Sun , Meiqin Hu , Jinjin Cheng (2018), "Design and controllable synthesis of ethylenediamine-grafted ion imprinted magnetic polymers for highly selective adsorption to perchlorate".
RSC Advances doi: 10.1039/c8ra06085a [Pubpeer].

[10]. Xiao-Hong Chen, Yong-Gang Zhao, Hao-Yu Shen, Mi-Cong Jin (2012), "Application of dispersive solid-phase extraction and ultra-fast liquid chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry in food additive residue analysis of red wine".
Journal of Chromatography A doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.074

[11]. Yong-Gang Zhao, Xiao-Hong Chen, Sheng-Dong Pan, Hao Zhu, Hao-Yu Shen, Mi-Cong Jin (2013), "Self-assembly of a surface bisphenol A-imprinted core–shell nanoring amino-functionalized superparamagnetic polymer".
Journal of Materials Chemistry A doi: 10.1039/c3ta12488f [Pubpeer].

[12]. Xiao-Hong Chen, Yong-Gang Zhao, Hao-Yu Shen, Li-Xin Zhou, Sheng-Dong Pan, Mi-Cong Jin (2014), "Fast determination of seven synthetic pigments from wine and soft drinks using magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry".
Journal of Chromatography A doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.060 [Pubpeer]

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Another Green World #2
'The Spice Must Flow' edition

This post was earlier cross-posted at Leonid Schneider's site, hence the unfrivolous tone. The version there is improved by Leonid's editing and frame-story. And some out-takes.

It turned out that an Indian journalist had been pursuing a similar story, looking at the research output of the CSIR-IITR as a whole (rather than just a single scientist there), and more generally at the broader CSIR. He was prompted to publish his own critical conclusions, citing Leonid's site for support. His story and its successors were picked up by other journalists; the institutions have promised top-level inquiries into academic standards among their researchers, and a lot of people have suddenly begun to to engage with questions at PubPeer rather than ignoring the critiques as below their dignity. Also, Paris, Rome, Munich and New York are burning.

[H/t Elisabeth]

These mice were treated for cancer in 2014, using nano-encapsulated pineapple-squeezed bromelain (VII and VIII are identical twins) [1].


Not only was the treatment successful, but it prolonged their lives long past the usual murine span so they could be treated for cancer again in 2018, this time using nano-encapsulated barberry squeezings [2].


Some uncertainly lingered whether the nano-encapsulation involved "Hyaluronic acid-grafted PLGA" or "O-Hexadecyl-Dextran" [3].

The history of "medicinal pineapple" is in fact an interest of mine (I suspect it may be inspired by the verbal resonance between Ananas and Ananias, the patron saint of liars). It began with a German charlatan who reasoned that Bromelain is a meat-softening enzyme, and tumours are made of meat. Anyway, our rodent friends provide a convenient entry point to the cuisine-based corpus of Professor Yogeshwer Shukla at CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (Delhi, India). For with the help of his colleagues and students, Dr Shukla has reported diverse botanical treatments for cancer (in mice!) in the course of his illustrious career... with squeezings from garlic, pomegranates, and mangos as well as pineapples. Also grape-skins and tea-leaves; and extracts from cinnamon, ginger and turmeric. Sometimes in isolation, sometimes in synergistic combination. It is as if an unlikely concatenation of events had led to the acceptance of a nouvelle-cuisine cookbook as a grant proposal.

As is the custom of my people, I shall draw heavily on comments left at the 'PubPeer' website, where 40 threads are currently devoted to discussing specific papers from his oeuvre. Some of those papers have been retracted, but surprisingly few in light of the unabashed data frauds they display. I can promise a promenade of hedgehogs, in illustration of Clyde's First Law ("Everything is better with googly eyes") [4].


But gratification deferred is gratification doubled, and to heighten the dramatic tension I'll begin with a peripheral figure: Sahdeo Prasad. The PubPeer archives for Prasad show him participating in much of the output from Shukla's output -- perhaps as a grad or post-grad student -- around 2007-2009, a notably productive period for the laboratory. After that he ascended to the MD Anderson Cancer Center (University of Texas) to work with Bharat Aggarwal and co-author a string of papers, later retracted because the amount of fabrication in them exceeded editorial tolerance. Prasad now collaborates with the mendacious scoundrels at OMICS, and also edits journal-shaped dumpsters for Longdom Publishing (an OMICS polyp).

Now Aggarwal's name should be familiar. He was a pioneer in the field of 'Jurisprudential Science', which is where you prove the validity of your theories and results by issuing bumptious, censorious legal threats against your critics. If Jurisprudential Science is not yet the title of a parasitical journal from OMICS, it should be. Disgrace as a con-man and departure from the MD Anderson did not greatly discommode Aggarwal's career. He continued to publish in Frontiers journals (aided by the complaisance of his quondam colleagues as editors and reviewers), and to star as a guest speaker at magical-thinking scamborees on "curing cancer with culturally-significant herbs and spices".

Many of the Prasad / Aggarwal impostures emerged from a research goal of finding curative benefits from turmeric (more exactly, from the dyestuff / secondary metabolite curcumin extracted from turmeric), obliging them to fake results because in practice curcumin is a shite drug. Aggarwal also played a role in in the Red-Wine bubble... I do not mean the beaded bubbles winking at the brim of a beaker of blushful Hippocrene, but rather, the swell of enthusiasm for the grape-skin component resveratrol which was going to lengthen lifetimes and cure heart disease and cancer by drinking red wine until people collectively tired of faking positive results.


The relevance of this little digression is that Yogeshwer Shukla espouses the same "culturally-significant plant product" ethnocentric-pharmacognosy approach to drug development, attempting to bring his artistic practice under the protective aegis of Ayurveda (like Aggarwal, he plays up the medieval-herbalism aspect of the Ayurvedic scammocopoeia and plays down the arsenic / mercury / lead toxic-metal alchemy). It must be tempting for scientists in India to claim that their work vindicates Ayurvedic Traditional Knowledge, so that as champions of Vedic cultural virtues they can call on the political forces of ethnocentric chauvinism to keep themselves dismissal-proof despite incompetence or corruption. As it happens, herbs like caraway and dill are important in my culture, especially their secondary metabolites infused in alcohol, but I do not pretend that Akvavit botanicals are responsible for my unnaturally-extended life-span.

But back to the PubPeer archives. With so many threads, we can only scratch the surface of the iceberg on the seashore and divert ourselves in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary. Rest assured that curing cancer does not distract Dr Shukla entirely from the 'Toxicology' aspect of his institution, and he also studies the carcinogen side of the coin, even if he sometimes confuses Deltamethrin and Benz-α-pyrene, on one hand [5], with Cypermethrin and mezerein on the other [6].


So let's start with a recent paper (2016) [7], in which the magic of mango squeezings (Lupeol) prevent a fungicide (Mancozeb) from causing cancer. Here are two panels from Figure 2. Now I am not wise in the ways of counting cells by fluorescence and graphing the results as a histogram, but I do know that histograms are supposed to be solid. If they are undercut by erosion or the ravages of termites (marked in red), something is wrong. It is also a problem if fine details are identical in what are purportedly independent experiments (marked in blue).


The pixels which were whittled away from the left-hand panel with the Eraser tool show up as black, after black / white reversing the right-hand panel and superimposing it on the former (everything else cancels out). This is MS Paint work, not even Photoshop! This clumsy, lazy falsification is a slap in the face for honest hard-working data forgers who take pride in their workmanship.

Here are earlier examples of white-anted overhanging histograms, from Fig 4A of [8] at left, while the outlined examples at right (from Figure 2 of [9]) are riddled with glitches, like free software:



In fact these are snapshots in the process of carving cell-count histograms from scratch. They are like scenes from the creation of a sculpture or a painting, like watching Giaocometti scraping away the clay or pigment he had added in an earlier stage in the cycle. Now [8] still centred on mango juice, while [9] focused on the cancer-preventing powers of garlic... but an overlay of these supposedly-separate data sets shows the sections of perimeter which were not re-worked, and leaves one to wonder if there were any original data measurements at all.


One last example before we move on. In contrast to the toppling minarets in Fig. 4A of [8], what renders 4B risible are similarities among its panels, where only a few pixels were scraped from one and added to another.


When we turn from to Figure 2 of [10], which at least still hoes the row of mango-juice cancer prevention (even though its protective powers are extended over mouse liver cells, rather than lymph node carcinoma of the prostate), it is not too great a surprise to encounter find cell-count plots that are outlined but superimposable.


In contrast to histogrammed cell counts, flow-cytometry plots (FACS) measure two fluorescent indicators of each cell's status and use them as coordinates to plot each cell as a point in two dimensions. They feature prominently in this body of work. They display a recurring quality of insufficient difference. Partial replications could arise when someone took a single file of data (recorded for one experimental condition) and ran it twice through different settings of the filter parameters... but also when someone modified a plot in Paint / Photoshop.

A good example is Figure 2 from a 2012 paper on the mutagenic mayhem wrought by Allethrin insecticide in the absence of mango protection. "Boeckella Robusta" wondered "could authors explain how the same dot plots were generated for different treatments in the indicated boxes?"

Indeed, in a superimposition of the Allethrin and Benz-α-pyrene panels, cancellation is complete across three quarters of the plane. There is a patch of white points unique to B-α-P treatment; an exact rectangle of discordant cells; and a zone of black/white pairs where cells were displaced en masse. The forger saw no need for anything sophisticated.

As for the Control panel, res ipsa loquitur.


Paper [1] from 2014 gave us the curative nano-pineapples. As "Notarius Cookei" noted, it also provides examples of FACS fakery. Here I choose Figures 6(G) and 6(H), and 9(F) and 9(H).


"When 99% of cells are identical in both plots, the most parsimonious explanation is that both plots used the same data."

I skip over other examples in my haste to reach the delirious heights of [12] and [13]. These companion papers from 2007 and 2008 fed ginger and mangos respectively through the juicer, but the authors liked the FACS plots so much that they used them in both.


Then someone customised and enhanced each version, cloning clusters of points with all the enthusiasm of a child who has just been introduced to the artistic possibilities of the potato-stamp medium. Figures 5(B) of [12] and 4(C) of [13] should be enlarged to appreciate their plenitude.



Another spurt of potato-stamp creativity occurred in 2011, in the panels of Figure 6 of [14]. The prospect of inhibiting the growth of skin tumours (in mice) with a synergistic combination of grape-skins and black tea evidently distracted the reviewers' attentions from the crystalline alignment of the FACS plots.




It also emerged that garlic and pomegranates, together, exerted exactly the same inhibition, resulting in a companion paper [15]. I do not rate for this recipe.


A lot of work went into these constructions, possibly more than simply conducting an experiment would require, so one can understand the authors' decision to repeat them across papers. Suffice to say that the cloning tool contributed to Figure 6 of [15].



Regrettably, [14] was retracted in April for a number of reasons (not just Figure 6). The world of science was thereby deprived of a row of hot-dogs comprising the ERK1/2 band of Figure 2.


These provide a segue to the inevitable Western-blot discussion. For this body of work has its fair share of gel bands with acrobatic talents, somersaulting and stretching and reflecting as they re-identify from one Protean protein to another (and from one paper to another). Figures 3, 4 and 6 from [16]:


The next somersaults are lane-specific and require more skill. At left, Apaf 1 (from Fig 5B of [4]) becomes Cytochrome C (in Fig 3(d) of [17]). At right, p21/ras (from 2(b) of [18]) becomes AKT (in Fig 5(b) of [17])!


At one end of the spectrum of manipulation, blots might be repeated in successive figures with different labels, relying on the incuriosity of readers and reviewers. At the other extreme, they are cut up and reassembled like letters in a ransom note. Here from [19] to [20].



All this is for substantive protein measurements. The normalising controls fare no better. As interest in Shukla's productions grew, 'Orophea Enterocarpa' identified a small but hard-working repertoire of loading controls. The 'bubble and hairline' control, for instance, first spotted in 2004 with five lanes for five experimental levels of garlic [21], has at least nine eleven recorded sightings, sometimes cut down to four lanes or extended to six with a lane duplication to match the details of the study design. These lanes corresponded to dosage of garlic again [27], tea [22, 24, 26], mango / lupeol [8, 10], grape-skins [4, 17, 23] and pineapple [19]. In its most recent appearance (2010) it widened to an eight-lane Interstate highway.


The "scrolls" were another hard-worked loading-control panel with five six sightings [8, 12, 17, 18, 22. 27]. Sadly, there is not space to show the "inchworm" panel, or the "dotted dashes", or the "Nike Swoosh", or even the "dashes-and-dots" in their four- and eight-lane incarnations.


My favourite in this little genre began in 2008 as Fig 3(A) of [4], holding sway over six variants of grape-skin therapy. It reappeared as a four-lane version as Fig 1(B) of [20], a pineapple study (other panels of 1(B) also repay attention); and in Fig 3 of [19]. Pay attention to the third (or first) lane: for greater standardisation, it was quadruplicated in another 2009 loading control [23].


While back where we started, [4] also starred Fig 6(B), the "hedgehog promenade". This proves to be another version of that single lane lane from 3(A), now multiplied six-fold and stretched vertically.


Admittedly, not everyone agrees on the necessity for dose-equalising controls. Between publication of [4] in 2008 and an amendment in 2016, it had featured Figs 3(B) and 5, in which five-lane letterbox panels of β-actin sufficed to normalise a series of six-lane blots of interest. Either the readers and reviewers and editors couldn't count or they didn't care.

Recall the point of compass-coded blotting methods: to quantify the protein expression within cells under specific conditions, by a circuitous but precise route (extracting cell contents and separating the proteins by racing them along an electrophoresis-gel racetrack or Proteodrome, then labelling them with antibodies so as to measure total antibody density). Now it is always possible that researchers did measure all the numbers they tabulate and analyse, producing blots in the process with which they could have illustrated their reports, and they only decide to fabricate the illustrations (or repurpose old ones) because of the artistic challenge.

After all this, there is a sense of relief to be had from meeting plain microphotographs of vat-grown tumour cells from the A549 cell-line, rendered fluorescent by different treatment with black tea polyphenols [16]. Or perhaps they hailed from the HeLa and SiHa cell-lines [25].


I had originally hoped to show some Northern blots of RNA expression (Caspase-3 becomes iκBα); or perhaps some DNA fragmentation assays, which display a lapidary, mosaic nature when closely examined. But this report is long enough. I must be content with this loading control from [19], which reminds me (when the lightness is turned up) of a row of caddis-fly larvae.



Now I am not alleging retouching or Photoshop manipulations, but there are two images of Dr Yogeshwer Shukla on the Intertubes. The version shown on his staff page at the CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research website has changed a lot from the version on his ResearchGate account.



If this is the effect of pineapple or mango or grape-skin treatment, he is his own best advertisement for his discoveries.


[1] "Anti-Cancer Activity of Bromelain Nanoparticles by Oral Administration" Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology (2014)
Priyanka Bhatnagar, Soma Patnaik, Amit K. Srivastava, Mohan K. R. Mudiam, Yogeshwer Shukla, Amulya K. Panda, Aditya B. Pant, Pradeep Kumar, Kailash C. Gupta
https://pubpeer.com/publications/D7569FE3179E5C77F10CD7D0CAFF1C

[2] "Hyaluronic acid-grafted PLGA nanoparticles for the sustained delivery of berberine chloride for an efficient suppression of Ehrlich ascites tumors" Drug Delivery and Translational Research (2018)
Priyanka Bhatnagar, Manisha Kumari, Richa Pahuja, A. B. Pant, Y. Shukla, Pradeep Kumar, K. C. Gupta
https://pubpeer.com/publications/17D26A485788CD2B46B52781D8DD50

[3] O-hexadecyl-dextran entrapped berberine nanoparticles abrogate high glucose stress induced apoptosis in primary rat hepatocytes" PLoS ONE (2014)
Radhika Kapoor, Shruti Singh, Madhulika Tripathi, Priyanka Bhatnagar, Poonam Kakkar, Kailash Chand Gupta
https://pubpeer.com/publications/012D4D634C827AE2183864F22FD1A0

[4] "Resveratrol induces apoptosis involving mitochondrial pathways in mouse skin tumorigenesis". Life Sciences (2008).
Neetu Kalra, Preeti Roy, Sahdeo Prasad, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/4197501DBC472982247DE0AFA234E3

[5] "Early changes in proteome levels upon acute deltamethrin exposure in mammalian skin system associated with its neoplastic transformation potential" Journal of Toxicological Sciences (2013)
Jasmine George, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/F65D2C5FFC638303800927B2E28661

[6] "Cypermethrin exposure leads to regulation of proteins expression involved in neoplastic transformation in mouse skin". Proteomics (2011).
Jasmine George, Amit Kumar Srivastava, Richa Singh, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/A384A6D53974AF627FC83477C2D43E

[7] "Protective effects of lupeol against mancozeb-induced genotoxicity in cultured human lymphocytes". Phytomedicine (2016).
Amit Kumar Srivastava, Sanjay Mishra, Wahid Ali, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/5AA6712082CCC91EEE90C4C5196BFE

[8] "Induction of apoptosis by lupeol and mango extract in mouse prostate and LNCaP cells". Nutrition & Cancer (2007).
Sahdeo Prasad, Neetu Kalra, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/5316531EB262091B243859A00C0137

[9] "Regulation of oxidative stress–mediated apoptosis by diallyl sulfide in DMBA-exposed Swiss mice". Human & Experimental Toxicology (2008).
S Prasad, N Kalra, S Srivastava, Y Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/92E0808D22F88CCD9F6CB46ACC36A8

[10] "Hepatoprotective effects of lupeol and mango pulp extract of carcinogen induced alteration in Swiss albino mice". Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (2007).
Sahdeo Prasad, Neetu Kalra, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/76E17585B48AC0B38E498B5EC23054

[11] "Allethrin-induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress in Swiss albino mice". Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis (2012).
Amit Kumar Srivastava, Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Abdulaziz A. Al-Khedhairy, Javed Musarrat, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/3D8F9A166D74AE68A779582773B7AD

[12] "In vitro and in vivo modulation of testosterone mediated alterations in apoptosis related proteins by [6]-gingerol". Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (2007).
Yogeshwer Shukla, Sahdeo Prasad, Chitra Tripathi, Madhulika Singh, Jasmine George, Neetu Kalra
https://pubpeer.com/publications/F9BEECCBE9F74B9796BFA11F079FF9

[13] "Regulation of signaling pathways involved in lupeol induced inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells". Molecular Carcinogenesis (2008).
Sahdeo Prasad, Nidhi Nigam, Neetu Kalra, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/977BFB109F38955F21E8259D74F9C0

[14] "Resveratrol and black tea polyphenol combination synergistically suppress mouse skin tumors growth by inhibition of activated MAPKs and p53". PLoS ONE (2011).
Jasmine George, Madhulika Singh, Amit Kumar Srivastava, Kulpreet Bhui, Preeti Roy, Pranav Kumar Chaturvedi, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/1ADC5417FEF462F17636A43498D670

[15] "Synergistic growth inhibition of mouse skin tumors by pomegranate fruit extract and diallyl sulfide: evidence for inhibition of activated MAPKs/NF-κB and reduced cell proliferation". Food & Chemical Toxicology (2011).
Jasmine George, Madhulika Singh, Amit Kumar Srivastava, Kulpreet Bhui, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/4A46821594EB7EB392F5A9BB471E5A

[16] "Tea polyphenols enhance cisplatin chemosensitivity in cervical cancer cells via induction of apoptosis". Life Sciences (2013).
Madhulika Singh, Kulpreet Bhui, Richa Singh, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/8BC7D198B330260105915A17A97BE7

[17] "Chemopreventive potential of resveratrol in mouse skin tumors through regulation of mitochondrial and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways". Pharmaceutical Research (2009).
Preeti Roy, Neetu Kalra, Sahdeo Prasad, Jasmine George, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/850796C5228A56DF71E8D4E4601C87

[18] "Regulation of p21/ras protein expression by diallyl sulfide in DMBA induced neoplastic changes in mouse skin". Cancer Letters (2006).
Annu Arora, Neetu Kalra, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/A5216BB8F4E05BB3A05E274F56618B

[19] "Regulation of p53, nuclear factor kappaB and cyclooxygenase-2 expression by bromelain through targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in mouse skin". Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (2008).
Neetu Kalra, Kulpreet Bhui, Preeti Roy, Smita Srivastava, Jasmine George, Sahdeo Prasad, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/4A3803831AE2603C9276ADB9750A85

[20] "Bromelain inhibits COX-2 expression by blocking the activation of MAPK regulated NF-kappa B against skin tumor-initiation* triggering mitochondrial death pathway". Cancer Letters (2009).
Kulpreet Bhui, Sahdeo Prasad, Jasmine George, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/19913878F1C75788FE95D3FD1FCADE

[21] "Modulation of p53 in 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced skin tumors by diallyl sulfide in Swiss albino mice". Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (2004).
Annu Arora, Imtiaz A Siddiqui, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/2DE54FD49EB1CAE22A11E768845A2C

[22] "Theaflavins induced apoptosis of LNCaP cells is mediated through induction of p53, down-regulation of NF-kappa B and mitogen-activated protein kinases pathways". Life Sciences (2007). Neetu Kalra, Kavita Seth, Sahdeo Prasad, Madhulika Singh, Aditya B. Pant, Yogeshwer Shukla https://pubpeer.com/publications/916B9A4E38D79FAF24E97FFB891AC8
[23] "Resveratrol enhances ultraviolet B-induced cell death through nuclear factor-kappaB pathway in human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells". Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications (2009). Preeti Roy, Esha Madan, Neetu Kalra, Nidhi Nigam, Jasmine George, Ratan Singh Ray, Rajendra K Hans, Sahdeo Prasad, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/D9903CAA6326AC41B3A998B45FDFD7

[24] "Tea polyphenols inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 expression and block activation of nuclear factor-kappa B and Akt in diethylnitrosoamine induced lung tumors in Swiss mice". Investigational New Drugs (2010).
Preeti Roy, Nidhi Nigam, Madhulika Singh, Jasmine George, Smita Srivastava, Hasnain Naqvi, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/202F3FCC1C55B94992B036E1761395

[25] "PLGA-encapsulated tea polyphenols enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy of cisplatin against human cancer cells and mice bearing Ehrlich ascites carcinoma". International Journal of Nanomedicine (2015).
Madhulika Singh, Priyanka Bhatnagar, Sanjay Mishra, Pradeep Kumar, Yogeshwer Shukla, Kailash Chand Gupta
https://pubpeer.com/publications/90ECC2BE7345B133B7E876E34801FB

[26] "Regulation of apoptosis by resveratrol through JAK/STAT and mitochondria mediated pathway in human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells". Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications (2008).
Esha Madan, Sahdeo Prasad, Preeti Roy, Jasmine George, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/15094E64ADDFEDF790E810B4E056EA

[27] "Involvement of multiple signaling pathways in diallyl sulfide mediated apoptosis in mouse skin tumors". Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.
Neetu Kalra, Annu Arora, Yogeshwer Shukla
https://pubpeer.com/publications/8123113071476EBDEF55EDEE231182