But it's all right; he is now a Whanganui district Councillor, and is sending out if anything more press releases than he emitted when still the mayor, most of them denying the legitimacy of Annette Main, his replacement. He had previously anointed his deputy mayor to be his hand-picked successor [Michael Laws has previous experience with sock-puppets], while welcoming Main's candidacy as "giv[ing] people a clear choice for October", so he was not well-pleased when voters chose the wrong way.
Compared to the super-majority landslide victory of 43% he himself won back in his first mayoral campaign back in 2004,
"Annette Main, with 36 per cent of the vote, has no mayoral mandate," he told the Wanganui Chronicle. [...]NO-ONE PUTS BABY IN A CORNER. ATTENTION MUST BE PAID.
Mr Laws said he had not heard from Ms Main since Saturday's election.
"It is the job of the incoming mayor to contact councillors - not the other way round - and I performed that same role in 2004 and 2007."
Michael has promised to "work with anyone, elected or unelected, who is dedicated to the best interests of Wanganui"; this sounds vaguely as if he will set up a Council-in-Exile in conjunction with the rejected councillors and mayoral candidates, but perhaps he has something more benign in mind.
Suspicious minds are already betting on how long it will take him to set up Facebook pages under a range of false names to rally opposition to the illegitimate Main regime.
--------------------------------
Recent outbreaks of Lhaws-related hilarity include his announcement to the media back in August about his relationship with an unsuitable woman from another social class, in which he claimed that a nebulous left-wing conspiracy was about to release details of their time together and copies of the salacious texts* they exchanged (in order to destroy his non-existent political career), thus obliging him to step in first and release the details preemptively. She was not well-pleased.* Really, no-one wants to read the details of Michael Laws' sex-life. Particularly not this:
Meanwhile, a mystery brunette caused a stir when appearing to perform an intimate act on Laws at the table in a posh Auckland restaurant while he dined with several media stars.
Onlookers were shocked at their actions at Toto restaurant in central Auckland last year.
The encounter took place in May last year at a dinner attended by Marcus Lush, Martin Devlin, Willie Jackson, John Tamihere, Maggie Barry, Karyn Hay and then-Mediaworks boss Brent Impey.
[...]
Those seated at the same table as Laws were said to be aware the act was taking place but ignored it as they didn't want to make a scene.
33 comments:
We may be losing The Hobbit overseas
Damn Flores islanders!
an unsuitable woman from another social class
Was she a Dirdirwoman of the "Immaculate" caste?
Hard to believe, I know, but there is a reality outside Planet of Adventure.
Hard to believe, I know, but there is a reality outside Planet of Adventure
Typical sub-man talk!
Hard to believe, I know, but there is a reality outside Planet of Adventure
Scurrilous lies! Well, perhaps not, but Jack Vance was a hell of an author.
S.C. is a BLASPHEMER!
~
Family of Sperling said yesterday she had been a typical middle class Kiwi mother before drifting into P addiction
YUCK.
WHAT WAS THE ACT?
Dammit. I HATE that.
Handjob? Footjob? ELBOWJOB? Dirty Sanchez?
What the hell kind of journalism is THIS supposed to be?
KeyRiste on a Ball Gag...
A full-on dildo-wetsuiting would demand extraordinary levels of politeness.
Dear Penthouse Forum, I am a politician in New Zealand and I never thought something like this might happen to me...
It appears that everyone in the restaurant saw the mystery woman, so at least we know that she did not spend the entire the meal under the table.
she had been a typical middle class Kiwi mother before drifting into P addiction
YUCK.
Oh noes, Laws is a social climber!
One reason for the hilarity produced by the whole episode is that the mayoralty had been Laws' secondary career, supplementing his income from his day-job as a talk-back radio host and a tabloid-newspaper columnist. And before he brought the Sperling affair to everyone's attention (while blaming his shadowy political foes for making him bring it to everyone's attention), one of the regular recipients of his Five-Minute Hates had been amphetamine-using solo mothers. He thought they were evil people and bad parents whose children should be taken away before they grew into amoral monsters who would break things belonging to the middle class.
Oh Gawd. I...I just didn't realize.
I mean, I must P ten times a day, and more at night. I know I couldn't stop if I wanted to. If I'm out running errands and I have to wait to P sometimes it gets so bad it HURTS.
Who can help me with this awful P addiction?
The P is short for 'pants'.
Well, I'm certainly NOT addicted to pants. Frankly, I don't even know where they are...
p is for panties
panties panties panties
[that was for Jennifer]
Perhaps - and this is just a suggestion - he should be commended for putting aside his view that all children of drug addicts are hopeless, and that are drug addicts are hopeless.
Out of all of this - i would hope that everyone could see some good in it. No one is ever hopeless. I have found more happiness than i ever imagined could be possible - on the other side of such terrible choices.
Perhaps his association with me opened his mind regarding people from different backgrounds other than his own.
Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't though - as far as you lot are concerned?
Truly it's an ill wind that blows nobody any good.
Hi Jackie. Thank you for dropping in, and for reacting so well to the uncouth atmosphere of pointing and laughing that prevails in this corner of the bloggosphere.
I was trying not to cast asparagus on yourself -- possibly unsuccessfully -- when writing the post. We point and laugh at Michael Laws because he has annoyed Another Kiwi and myself on many occasions. That is why we enjoyed his discomfiture when the sweeping generalisations that were his stock-in-trade in his talkback-host role came into conflict with the real world.
Michael comes across as someone who discovered soon after entering politics that he was the smartest man in the National Party (which to be honest is not saying a lot); and since then he has been dealing mainly with journalists (even his dealings with his Whanganui electorate have been mediated mainly by sending out press releases, in the comfortable knowledge that even if they are full of bullshit they will still be published); which has all created an unhealthy sense of his superiority. SO I can understand why he's an arrogant prat, and why he uses the various bully-pulpits that are available to him, but I can still appreciate the spectacle when he is deflated.
I think better of him for knowing that you see him as a good person underneath, and I do commend him for stepping outside those sweeping generalisations.
David
David - I can appreciate that some people's opinions of him are less than favourable. I can also appreciate people making fun of him...and making fun of me - on paper, my past makes me look like a person of questionable character, to say the least.
I just think that it should be noted that, after all the opinions he has expressed regarding drug addicts, their children, and even people from a lower social class than himself - he was prepared to listen to my views. He met with me, with a very open mind. He has never once judged me for my past, or the terrible choices / mistakes that i have made...and still, he encourages me to continue to make my future better. This is a huge contrast to the person that says people who are in the situation that i was in should be sterilised.
He has now seen an example of hope for those people, and that good people can make terrible choices, but that no one is ever beyond redemption - except maybe in the Kahui case - it might be difficult to get him to admit that they are not beyond hope. ;)
I guess my point is - that it is frustrating to see me used as a tool to mock him - when in reality he should be commended for opening his mind, and listening to what someone like me had to say...and seeing the good in me.
Despite how displeased i was, at the relationship being made public, and how that has effected my life since - i think he should be cut some slack on this issue. I don't think i have heard him voice those views, again, since he met me. That is a good thing. It is also a good thing if just one person, who might be involved in that life right now, realises that there is hope, and they can make a better future for themselves. My face and name can be splashed everywhere for all i care - if my story gives just one person hope - then it is worth it.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and also to change those opinions. Before my terrible choices - i would have most likely said the same thing about drug addicts and hookers.
I have no doubt that you all have your own, probably very valid reasons for not liking the man - but give him this - he should be commended and not made fun of - for his willingness to listen to and give a person with my past, a chance.
You have a great day. The sun is beautiful - I am going to get me some of that!
Jackie
Thanks for commenting Jackie I was away from computers for a bit so I didn't see your comments until last night.
I back David's comments %100, Laws lives his life by public exposure, he can't complain when he gets public exposure.
I think that your story is inspiring but have never met you or anyone with a similar story. Laws seems to have needed personal experience to make him see that behind the headlines there are people. This has not stopped him delivering his judgment on many different classes of people on his radio show before or since.
While I have every sympathy for you have been through and the circumstances in which you find yourself, I have no sympathy for Laws.
-Hamish
You have a great day. The sun is beautiful
Thanks. Sadly, here in Wellington we don't do sunlight.
I do have some qualms about poking the borax at Laws from the cover of anonymity, but I try not to say anything that I wouldn't be willing to say face-to-face in a pub. This policy has caused a number of encounters with angry drunken people but fortunately I have a high tolerance for bottles-broken-on-my-head-related activities.
Indeed, Smut's score in the Broken Bottle to the Head Riddled Contributers Assessment Board were high enough to warrant further investigation and the uncovering of a false head smuggling ring. Sadly, he has lost track of what precise head he is wearing now, but that is no barrier to promotion in the Riddled hierarchy. In fact those of us in the management group consider it to be an distinct advantage, what with plausible deniablity and all.
I completely understand and appreciate both of your views.
I too, for years, have lived by the rule - Never do or say anything, to or about anyone, that i would not be prepared to do or say to their face.
You think having that attitude is dangerous in a pub? Try having it in a brothel full of crackheads! lol I am lucky to be alove and count every day as a blessing!
Hate to tell you Wellingtonians this - but the sun is shining even more today, than the past few days up here!
Have a good one...and poke away at Laws all you like...he has big shoulders...but give him a teeny tiny bit of cred for opening his mind just a little bit where i was concerned.
:)
Very cool contributions Jackie, please stick around here, when the Whanganui sun goes away for 10 minutes or so! Aramoho boy, here.
I probably don't have the courage to write a story about me and Jackie, but I'd be pleased to know her.
And for the rest of you, be advised. If it weren't for the intervening ocean, anyone who wants to take a bottle to Herr Doktor would have to deal with me. Old and slow, but well steeped in unfairness....
Thanks you lot. I appreciate you hearing me out. :)
I might just stick around - i have to admit to having a giggle re some of your senses of humours, prior to making my comments.
Don't tell anyone that i admitted that though ;)
Hope you had a beautiful day down in Aramaho!
Well that was a fail.
I tried to be nice about him even after it ended...but...i ...just...couldn't....do....EEEETTTTT!
He went around telling people that it ended because i was going back to being a hooker...That was just one lie too many for me.
Jackie, you have shown great courage and don't need that guy making mess in your life. You have been very supportive of him and are better off free. We are pleased if you find some of our stuff funny. We, suffice it to say, find ourselves dangerously amusing.
I don't live in Aramoho no more, sadly.
Where do you live now? I am going to visit Wanganui again in a few weeks, to hang out with some friends that i was lucky enough to meet during my times down there. I could have bought you a coffee!
And for what it's worth, the people in these parts know a great deal about the really bad things I've done and they still seem to be willing to embrace me in their community.
To be honest, Jackie, if my crimes were limited to yours, I'd sleep better at night. You have nothing to hang your head about, and I'm pretty sure I'm not going outside the bounds to say you'll find yourself welcomed here.
Life is brief and love and community has immeasurable value and healing qualities.
I'm still looking, but I hope you find peace..
Mike - I have no issues regarding my past or crimes. I learned amazing things from every single mistake and terrible choice that i made. I don't beat myself up over them...i still...every day...learn from them, and try to turn them into something positive.
Michael thought i was "safe" because he thought i had shame in my life. When he realised that i didn't, and that i am actually a good person, he tried to bring shame into my life. I promised myself on the day that i left that horrible life behind me, that i would always live a life that i am proud of from that day forward...and Michael was not going to change that. He underestimated how important that promise that i made to myself is.
I would have continued to publicly support him, despite my view that he is not a good man...forever...had he not made his intentions and his manipulations so clear to me when he continued to harass me via text after it had ended. I think my previous comments in here are evidence of that.
I believe that we can never be wrong, when we have kindness in our hearts. I think the events of the past week, have proven that.
Perhaps that is a lesson that Laws can take away from this. I doubt it - but nothing and no one are every beyond hope. You just never know!
I can't imagine what it's like for you at the moment, Jackie, with the way the media and the political blogs are treating you as if you were a public figure with no right to privacy. So those supportive things that Another Kiwi said earlier -- please imagine that I said them also.
We appreciate the reasons that brought you here to set us right, and whatever happens afterwards, we'll go on appreciating that
Jackie, I live in Palmy these days.
Post a Comment