"Perhaps it is a manifestation of some historical calamity, one that wreaked such widespread psychic trauma that the painful memories were nigh-universally suppressed. But the repression bubbled up as a cultural neurosis, and residual engrams seeped through the seams of amnesia
ALTERNATIVE URAL-ALTAIC EXPLAINING VOICE:
In the time-line we presently inhabit, linguists evidently did not accept the notion that the Uralic group of languages (which is to say, the Fenno-Ugric group, broadened by the inclusion of the Samoyedic language outliers, spread out across the Siberian steppes) evolved from the same common ancestor as the Altaic languages (i.e. the Turkic and Tungusic and Mongolic families).* Uralic languages are weird of grammar and morphology, also agglutinative, so should be avoided if you have a wheat intolerance. The weirdness peaks in the Ugric branch which gave us Hungarians.** Meanwhile Altaic languages are united by their own forms of weirdness.
In the absence of a phylogenetic connection as accepted fact, philologists did not set out to reconstruct that shared ancestor... nor did they bring up their own children to speak Proto-Uraltaic as their mother tongue, to see what effect would come of exposing formative minds to the two combined forms of weirdness. Never wondering what happened to the tribes originally speaking the language, that left their descendents dispersed all across Eurasia.
Endless Steppes
Perhaps someone went back in a time machine and destroyed the most cogent written records... or discredited the theorists who were promoting the Uralic-Altaic hypothesis most persuasively... or convinced them to switch to more remunerative careers as bakers specialising in the manufacture of novelty muffins. Leaving a few fugitive traces, disguised as fictions, but you can't expect a thorough job from independent contractors.*** So in this time-line, the speakers of Proto-Uraltaic did not raise up armies seeking the world domination to which they felt entitled, and the world was not plunged into a cauldron of war. But do we get any thanks? DO WE BOGROLL.
Never mind, we've forgotten the whole thing ourselves.
"You are still loonies", opined head barmaid Evangeline van Holsterin.
---------------------------------------------------------------
* There are still a few dead-enders -- not all of them cultural chauvinists and racial supremacists! -- convinced that Hungarian is too exotic and Romantic and Outsider to be just another European language, and must instead be linked to Turkish; this leads to entertaining academic knife-fights. At least they have abandoned the notion that Hungarians are galactic explorers, stranded on Earth amid savages when the mothership left prematurely.** In one example of Weird, the colour lexicon in Komi-Zyrian -- a member of the Permian branch -- fits into MacLaury's aberrant developmental trajectory, in contrast to the usual Berlin-Kay sequence. That is, the language developed through a stage of having a single "Yellow-with-Green" colour category, stretching the same basic term to cover "warm" yellows as well as "cool" greens, only recently making a lexical distinction... so now ‘yellow’ in Komi is koĺkviž (egg-viž) while 'green' is turunviž (grass-viž). There are similar traces of the same pathway in other Fenno-Ugric tongues. I was going to write a paper about this but Ryabina got there first.
9 comments:
Ryabina's paper is a 404 error now, so maybe it's not too late? I think the real reason people insisted on Hungarian being Altaic for so long is that they thought the Hungarians were Huns, which only stands to reason, even though it is wrong. I'm heartened to learn, by the way, that it is still not completely ridiculous to think of Japanese and Korean, which are pretty agglutinative, as part of a big Altaic family, and maybe the Dravidian languages as well.
So they were garians? At least that's settled.
~
Blugger had borked the link. Ficqsed now.
I was vaguely under the impression that the Japanese / Korean link was becoming more respectable (with linguists finding more in common between them when they looked at the oldest recorded versions of the two languages). But I am prepared to be disabused.
So the Finnic branch of the Uralic group -- since everyone is asking -- is Finnish and Estonian, and the Saamic languages up there in what Political Correctness prevents me from calling "Lappland", and a continuum spread around Karelia of what are either dialects, or separate languages, depending on the linguist classifying them.
Whether there is a separate Ugric branch (formed from Hungarian plus Khanty and Mansi, around the Ob River on the wrong side of the Urals) is a matter of contention. Mari and Erzya and Moksha may belong to the Permian branch and then again may not; and whether the Samoyedic languages belong together as a separate though remote branch of Uralic (as opposed to being individual remote branches) also remains moot.
Successive Russian regimes have agreed on one thing, which is that they should wipe out all these small languages, in the interests of making life easier for linguists.
Still nothing on where Basque fits in or doesn't?
It is the missing link between Etruscan and Sumerian. As any fule kno.
Here, I'll answer my own question.
This always happens.
Gutboy Barrelhouse died for your sins.
In one example of Weird, the colour lexicon in Komi-Zyrian -- a member of the Permian branch -- fits into MacLaury's aberrant developmental trajectory, in contrast to the usual Berlin-Kay sequence. That is, the language developed through a stage of having a single "Yellow-with-Green" colour category, stretching the same basic term to cover "warm" yellows as well as "cool" greens, only recently making a lexical distinction
The root word described the color of a Dimetrodon.
Just call me a greenery-yallery, Grosvenor Gallery,
Foot-in-the-grave young man.
We apologise for the lack of Mu.
Post a Comment