The concern, of course, is that W*k*pedia editors would amplify their Wikientries with passages copy-pasted from the Encyclopedia, soon to be followed by the uncredited appearances of those passages in blogs and discussion boards and Pinterest pages, providing those Wikientries with independent sources of corroboration. Each iteration of copy-pasta nudges the Encyclopedia contents one rung up the Ladder of Ontological Status towards the happy state of 'Stuff that Everyone Knows', and then we would be over-run with invisible tigers and towers of blood and Hrönir of the third and thirteenth order, and small cones of an unknown metal of preternatural density, and schools would be invaded by the (conjectural) "primitive language" of Tlön.
The camel-poop invention links in turn (via click-bait churnalism) to the 'camel poop bomb' story dreamed up by Jasper Maskelyne ("war magician" and self-promoting fabulist), as fodder for click-bait churnalists.
Camel "apples" became a good luck charm for the German military. The Allies discovered their habit of intentionally running tanks over piles of the droppings for good luck. So the Allies developed and planted land mines that looked like camel dung! When the Germans caught on to the trick, they began to avoid fresh piles of camel manure. In turn, the Allies caught on and began to make mines that looked like camel dung that had already been run over by a tank and therefore seemed safe enough to a Nazi driver. Genius.Maskelyne contributed more to the Allied war effort in North Africa than any other man including Monty (in his account), or was a skiving credit-grabbing waste of a pair of boots (according to everyone else). Also a waste of a name that was clearly intended for a Jack Vance character. So the movie...
Possible film adaptations[edit]
In 2003, director Peter Weir and actor Tom Cruise were working on a film based on The War Magician.[21] When questions rose about how much of The War Magician was factual and how much was invented by the author, the project was dropped while still in pre-production.[21]
In 2015 Benedict Cumberbatch was reported as signing on to play the lead role in a Maskelyne film.[22] At the time, the project was pending the selection of a director.[22]
Excuse me for the interruption. Any movie could become a gullible parade through Maskelyne's Munchausen memoires, or a more interesting parallax-view contrast between his Walter-Mitty fantasies and consensus reality. The absence of Terry Gilliam and Werner Herzog from the director's chair does not fill me with anticipation.Benedict Cumberbatch has been cast as ‘WAR MAGICIAN’ with Colin Trevorrow set to direct.
— DiscussingFilm (@DiscussingFilm) March 16, 2021
The film follows an international “magic gang” who conspired with a British illusionist and a female military intelligence officer to defeat the Nazis.
(Source: Deadline) pic.twitter.com/fSgGquNstR
I also fess up to skepticism about the presence of an anthropomorphic hyaena photographer, Ngorongoro Crater, as a denizen of Richard Scarry's "Busytown". Let alone a terrier named after a Disney animator.
John Parr Miller: A terrier at the town party, apparently a chef, named after a Disney animator who then moved into illustration of children's books.
2 comments:
There was discussion in the #tilderadio IRC channel over in the tildeverse about missing real encyclopaedias; I suppose some are better than others, and I am not entirely clear on how authors are sourced and so on, and of course they are not as... comprehensive as Wikipedia, but not quite as chaotic and easily f&cked up. Many of us fondly recall Encarta on CD ROM, as well as various volumes from school, library, or home.
My friend Andy maintains that Wikipedia is a wonderful anarchistic crowd-sourced knowledge project, but then you see things like the “Scots language” Wikipedia and it really puts a dent in one’s faith. (I was alerted to that over at Pharyngula.) I do think that Wikipedia can be good for a gloss of something and some initial basic information, and a decent jumping off point if you actually follow links and go down to the sources.
It is also a source of entertainment when you find some entry that went off the rails.
I particularly enjoy the History and Discussion pages accompanying entries where there has been an Edit War. Usually involving a zealot and umpteen sockpuppets battling a bemused coalition of wikipedians who want to keep the entry centred on reality, even while working within the Wikipedia rules of evidence and consensus. Some of these Discussions are crying out to be adapted into opera.
Post a Comment