in order to praise one's sexual prowess and give excuses for one's unavailability. Nor is there any shame in denying that sock- puppetry when it comes to light.But "John Barron"? SRSly?
Saturday, May 14, 2016
Huge sockpuppets, the classiest sockpuppets
Of course there is nothing wrong or shameful about assuming a false identity
in order to praise one's sexual prowess and give excuses for one's unavailability. Nor is there any shame in denying that sock- puppetry when it comes to light.
But "John Barron"? SRSly?
in order to praise one's sexual prowess and give excuses for one's unavailability. Nor is there any shame in denying that sock- puppetry when it comes to light.But "John Barron"? SRSly?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I can't really see Trump as a Spinrad fan... hell, I can't really picture him reading a book, not even one of his own.
Hey, old chum, are you aware of this?
https://amandamaryandgcmaf.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/nature-attacks-you-and-nature-heals-you/
are you aware of this?
Amanda Mary has a policy of hoovering up every media or blog reference to her GcMAF business and echoing it on her own blog, complimentary or hostile, as long as it is attention.
https://amandamaryandgcmaf.wordpress.com/category/uk-articles/
I have no idea whether she's doing it by hand or has automated the process. I am sad that the formatting of the copied posts goes all cattywumpus, but I am happy to see my material endorsed by the republication, for it takes defamation lawsuits off the table.
I can't really see Trump as a Spinrad fan
Still, you have to admit that the 1979 cover-art portrayal of Barron (by Peter Gudynas) has elements of Trumpery.
But "John Barron"?
Or John Miller. His play-by-play for the Giants, always very classy.
Post a Comment